Regular and Substantive Interaction (RSI) in Online Asynchronous Courses
Regular and Substantive Interaction (RSI) refers to frequent, consistent, and meaningful academic interaction between instructors and students. RSI distinguishes Distance Education from Correspondence Education and supports student success through active instructor presence, guidance, and feedback.
RSI at a Glance
Effective RSI is typically demonstrated through a combination of:
- Instructional communication that guides students through course content and learning activities
- Meaningful feedback on student learning
- Facilitation of student interaction and engagement
Key Reminder: No single activity alone fulfills RSI expectations. Effective RSI is demonstrated through multiple forms of instructor-initiated academic interaction throughout the course.
About Instructional Announcements
Announcements can support RSI when they guide learning, clarify course concepts, address common challenges, or reconnect students to course content. Reminder-only announcements do not count as substantive interaction by themselves.
Effective instructional announcements should:
- Guide students back into the learning
- Reconnect students to key ideas or upcoming work
- Highlight patterns, insights, or common challenges
- Help students engage more deeply with course concepts
The goal of an instructional announcement is to re-engage students with the learning process, not simply deliver logistical information such as due-date reminders.
RSI Expectations for Fully Online Asynchronous Courses
Instructor-Initiated Interaction
Instructors should proactively initiate interaction to ensure students:
- Access course materials
- Understand course concepts
- Participate regularly in learning activities
Courses should also include opportunities for community building and may use appropriate Canvas and third-party tools to support instructor–student and student–student interaction.
Examples of instructor-initiated interaction may include:
- Weekly instructional announcements that guide students back to course concepts or upcoming learning activities
- Personalized feedback on assignments
- Discussion facilitation or guided reflections
- Short summary messages reviewing progress or key concepts
Frequency of Contact
Instructor engagement should be predictable and consistent throughout the term and aligned with the course length and content.
Instructors should clearly inform students:
- How often they can expect to hear from the instructor
- Which communication methods will be used
Examples of communication methods include:
- Individual feedback on assignments
- Discussion replies
- Instructional announcements
- Group messages
The expected frequency and method of contact should be stated in the syllabus and reinforced in the course orientation or welcome message.
Recommended Weekly Rhythm
- At least one course-wide instructional communication, such as an announcement addressing course concepts, commonly missed concepts, upcoming learning activities, or a weekly summary
- At least one type of meaningful feedback, individual or group
- Regular facilitation of student engagement
Interrupted Contact
When unavoidable interruptions occur, such as illness, notify students through an announcement and/or email and provide the expected duration.
If the interruption lasts four or more working days, the supervising administrator should be notified.
Types of Contact
Instructors should use a variety of communication channels to establish and maintain regular and substantive interaction. These may include, but are not limited to:
Instructor-Initiated Communication
- Instructional announcements
- Orientation or review sessions
- Weekly wrap-up or summary messages
Feedback and Assessment
- Timely feedback on assignments
- Personalized comments or brief audio/video responses
- Group or individual meetings
Facilitation and Student Engagement
- Discussion forums and peer interaction
- Office hours, virtual or in-person
- Video conferencing such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or Pronto
- Course messaging and email
References & Resources
- ACCJC (Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges) Pilot Quality Continuum Rubric for Distance Education
- Federal Title IV Compliance in Online Courses
- 34 CFR § 600.2 (Definitions of Distance Education & Correspondence Education from the Department of Education, Office of Secondary Education)
- CVC-OEI Course Design Rubric (California Virtual Campus Online Educators Initiative)
- Page developed by the Distance Education & Technology Committee (DETC) during Spring and Fall 2025 (see 10/21/25 DETC agenda and minutes ).